~Kipper~
04-17 06:11 PM
and what stamp costs $0.00?
whos to say it has to cost something - its the kirupa way
+ i prefer nice n simple. its less complcated :)
each to their own i guess but thanks for your input
whos to say it has to cost something - its the kirupa way
+ i prefer nice n simple. its less complcated :)
each to their own i guess but thanks for your input
wallpaper Map of Kimberley region
adhantari
08-13 03:01 PM
I have an idea. We can make following proposal to lawmakers....
In next 2 years they can sunset EB3 catagory. In exchange for that they will give visa numbers enough for everyone whose EB3 485 is pending or in pipeline(labor, 140)
What you guys think of this idea?
Anyways there are lot of people who just want to keep EB1 and EB2 catagories. We may get support from them with this proposal......
In next 2 years they can sunset EB3 catagory. In exchange for that they will give visa numbers enough for everyone whose EB3 485 is pending or in pipeline(labor, 140)
What you guys think of this idea?
Anyways there are lot of people who just want to keep EB1 and EB2 catagories. We may get support from them with this proposal......
gcisadawg
03-24 11:02 PM
I've heard about AC21. What is AC360 - some new USCIS provision ?
google?
google?
2011 wallpaper australian gold rush
return_to_india
02-15 07:07 PM
CLEARANCE OF INCOMING PASSENGERS (http://www.cbec.gov.in/travellers.htm)
more...
ssreenu
05-12 02:45 PM
Yes, you can GC is a future job. So its definitely possible.
Does it mean I can file a 485 even without joining the employer and can eventually join him before the 485 is approved. Any risks in this process?
Thanks in advance.
Does it mean I can file a 485 even without joining the employer and can eventually join him before the 485 is approved. Any risks in this process?
Thanks in advance.
eb3_nepa
06-08 12:41 PM
:p maybe 2020, i am sure my PD will become current the day i buy tickets to return:D
Then buy those tickets already!! ;)
Then buy those tickets already!! ;)
more...
perm2gc
05-27 10:33 PM
I am stuck in PBEC. Please let me know if you need any information.
please contact pdakwala at the number he mentioned in the thread.
please contact pdakwala at the number he mentioned in the thread.
2010 Can also see a thriving gold
ajju
09-03 10:50 PM
Well, my forms were returned to my attorney because of some filing issue. So instead of my EAD as I was expecting I have to refile. Of course I now have a job offer that I would like to take.
My husband (who is a US citizen) is in school and will be depending on my salary. I dont know if that counts as a big financial loss.
Where can I go to find this out. I think my attorney i doing a less than great job in giving me the proper options to choose from.
Any help would be appreciated.
Check with your lawyer... (not this old one.. who's so forgotful :-))
Get a better lawyer like Murthy or Khanna... if your life depends on it...
My husband (who is a US citizen) is in school and will be depending on my salary. I dont know if that counts as a big financial loss.
Where can I go to find this out. I think my attorney i doing a less than great job in giving me the proper options to choose from.
Any help would be appreciated.
Check with your lawyer... (not this old one.. who's so forgotful :-))
Get a better lawyer like Murthy or Khanna... if your life depends on it...
more...
vinnysuru
03-18 03:32 PM
Hello,
Assuming a 40 hr/week position, a person works 2080 hours per year. The Annual Salary for a $46/hr position is $95680/year.
Also, if you only have annual salary for the new position, you could convert to hourly by dividing by 2080.
But I wouldn't even worry about all this. Just send in the annual salary figure (just for your own satisfaction make sure it is more than $46 per hour) and USCIS will figure out the rest.
Hope that helps.
Assuming a 40 hr/week position, a person works 2080 hours per year. The Annual Salary for a $46/hr position is $95680/year.
Also, if you only have annual salary for the new position, you could convert to hourly by dividing by 2080.
But I wouldn't even worry about all this. Just send in the annual salary figure (just for your own satisfaction make sure it is more than $46 per hour) and USCIS will figure out the rest.
Hope that helps.
hair house of gold rush Australia
amindarshana
12-01 11:04 AM
Thank you Wandmaker..
My attorny gave me same sugestion.
But I was wondering do we have to take special permission from USCIS to re-file or just send the application with proof of previous deleivery.
And if Yes-- How?
My attorny gave me same sugestion.
But I was wondering do we have to take special permission from USCIS to re-file or just send the application with proof of previous deleivery.
And if Yes-- How?
more...
rtaqi
07-25 07:30 AM
There shouldn't be any issues. The H1 visa stamp on your passport is seperate from the I-797 approval that you received, both are valid. Your wife should also have no problems getting an H4 using your current I-797. I had a freind recently who was in the exact same situation and he and his wife both didn't have any issues.
hot inspiredworlds.com | gold rush
anyluck?
06-18 12:58 AM
Hi
My wife is on H4 visa.She got an offer from Non profit organization and they are ready to do H1B.As it is Non profit Organization is that correct she can start working as soon as H1B is approved.
Is it possible to Transfer H1b in future to regular company if H1B quota exists.
Are there any restrictions involved.
Can any one please shed some light for me.
Thanks
My wife is on H4 visa.She got an offer from Non profit organization and they are ready to do H1B.As it is Non profit Organization is that correct she can start working as soon as H1B is approved.
Is it possible to Transfer H1b in future to regular company if H1B quota exists.
Are there any restrictions involved.
Can any one please shed some light for me.
Thanks
more...
house california gold rush, gold
solaris27
07-19 10:43 AM
<<date>>
<<NAME>.
Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services
Nebraska Service Center
P.O. Box 87485
Lincoln, NE 68501
Dear <<NAME>:
This letter is to confirm that <COMPANY NAME> currently employs and intends to offer permanent
full time employment to <YOUR NAME> as an <DESIGNATION> at a salary of <SALARY>. He began employment
with us on [insert date].
His job duties are: [insert the job duties].
If you have any questions regarding this application, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
XXX
Title
<<NAME>.
Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services
Nebraska Service Center
P.O. Box 87485
Lincoln, NE 68501
Dear <<NAME>:
This letter is to confirm that <COMPANY NAME> currently employs and intends to offer permanent
full time employment to <YOUR NAME> as an <DESIGNATION> at a salary of <SALARY>. He began employment
with us on [insert date].
His job duties are: [insert the job duties].
If you have any questions regarding this application, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
XXX
Title
tattoo Story is gold is flown out
roseball
03-31 11:11 PM
Hi please can anyone kindly help? My husband would like to transfer to another company, but his current company is paying him lower than the prevailing wage. They said that the base salary plus overtime were meeting the prevailing wage requirement, but according to DOL regulations, the prevailing wage shouldn't include overtime pay. If the H-1B transfer petition is filed by the new company and we submit the current pay stubs which show a lower pay, will that be a problem? What are the possible solutions without making the current company pay more to make up the #s (they are not willing to do so)? Just don't want to get into trouble and get investigation involved.
We're so worried. Thank you so much in advance! Any suggestions/information would be helpful!
I don't think the beneficiary will be punished for employer not being able to pay the prevailing wage. Your H1 COE should go through fine even though current pay stubs show lower salary. Key for getting COE approved is to be employed and maintain legal status. Ex-employer could face some issues in future with H1 extensions/new applications.
We're so worried. Thank you so much in advance! Any suggestions/information would be helpful!
I don't think the beneficiary will be punished for employer not being able to pay the prevailing wage. Your H1 COE should go through fine even though current pay stubs show lower salary. Key for getting COE approved is to be employed and maintain legal status. Ex-employer could face some issues in future with H1 extensions/new applications.
more...
pictures dresses australian gold rush
wandmaker
12-05 08:28 PM
I don't have enough time to get my status changed from USA.
Chances of F1 denial is very high, if you apply from Mexico or Canada since it is going to be first F1. If at all you want to apply F1 outside USA, it is advisible to try at home consulate - still you will have to convince the IO that you do not intend to immigrate (which you may not be able to do it as your spouse is already here). Both options, in my opinion, big NO NO
Chances of F1 denial is very high, if you apply from Mexico or Canada since it is going to be first F1. If at all you want to apply F1 outside USA, it is advisible to try at home consulate - still you will have to convince the IO that you do not intend to immigrate (which you may not be able to do it as your spouse is already here). Both options, in my opinion, big NO NO
dresses Australia began the 1850s gold
speddi
07-13 02:44 PM
I was in the process of job change and the July fiasco happened and I was forced to stay with the company that filed my 485 (cannot change company for 6 months).
more...
makeup Largest Mining Rush since
softcrowd
06-17 07:50 PM
I & My wife are working on H1-B visas currently. We two simulataneously started our Greencard process with our employers.
Both of us have a priority date of Sept 2006 & our EB category is Eb2. Both our labors got approved & applied for I-140s. My wife's I-140 got approved recently (from TSC) while Mine is still pending with NSC (Nebraska dates are behind).
A couple of months back, my current employer offered me a pre-aproved EB3 labor (from April 2004) & asked me to apply for I-140 (Substitute). He told me that once approved, I can port this EB3 2004 priority date onto my Eb2 I140. I applied for the same in premium processing, subsequently got an ability-to-Pay RFE and employer is working on providing audited financial statements from 2004.
Overall, we have 3 I-140s between me (2 pending) & my wife (1 Approved). Now that everything is current which one should we pick for applying I-485....This has become a big puzzle for us.
Here below is a snapshot of our status:
Me - EB2 (Sept 2006) - I-140 Pending
- EB3 (Apr 2004) - I-140 Pending (got RFE)
My wife - EB2 (Sept 2006) - I-140 Approved
Here are the options we could think of -
I know, the safest way is to apply I-485 to my wife's approved I-140. But with the DHS's forecast that retrogression is going to be back anytime around Spetember of this year, I am not sure if applying 485 based on a year 2006's date is any useful!! (We get EAD but we may be struck for years to get the green cards).
Is there an option for both of us to apply for I-485s (I will be dependent on my wife's application & my wife would be dependent on my application). If possible, this option gives us a safety net & also helps us in picking up the best. I know at some point, we have to choose between either of the I-485s but hopefully in a couple of months, we get clarity when both my I-140s are approved.
Or is it possible for me to apply for AOS on my pending EB2 2006 I-140 and then once my other Eb3 I-140 is also approved, Can I port the PDs while my I-485 is pending??
In essence, I am trying to find out a way to take advantage of 2004 Priority date I have (assuming Eb3 I-140 is approved).
Could you please help out, if you have any ideas!!
Both of us have a priority date of Sept 2006 & our EB category is Eb2. Both our labors got approved & applied for I-140s. My wife's I-140 got approved recently (from TSC) while Mine is still pending with NSC (Nebraska dates are behind).
A couple of months back, my current employer offered me a pre-aproved EB3 labor (from April 2004) & asked me to apply for I-140 (Substitute). He told me that once approved, I can port this EB3 2004 priority date onto my Eb2 I140. I applied for the same in premium processing, subsequently got an ability-to-Pay RFE and employer is working on providing audited financial statements from 2004.
Overall, we have 3 I-140s between me (2 pending) & my wife (1 Approved). Now that everything is current which one should we pick for applying I-485....This has become a big puzzle for us.
Here below is a snapshot of our status:
Me - EB2 (Sept 2006) - I-140 Pending
- EB3 (Apr 2004) - I-140 Pending (got RFE)
My wife - EB2 (Sept 2006) - I-140 Approved
Here are the options we could think of -
I know, the safest way is to apply I-485 to my wife's approved I-140. But with the DHS's forecast that retrogression is going to be back anytime around Spetember of this year, I am not sure if applying 485 based on a year 2006's date is any useful!! (We get EAD but we may be struck for years to get the green cards).
Is there an option for both of us to apply for I-485s (I will be dependent on my wife's application & my wife would be dependent on my application). If possible, this option gives us a safety net & also helps us in picking up the best. I know at some point, we have to choose between either of the I-485s but hopefully in a couple of months, we get clarity when both my I-140s are approved.
Or is it possible for me to apply for AOS on my pending EB2 2006 I-140 and then once my other Eb3 I-140 is also approved, Can I port the PDs while my I-485 is pending??
In essence, I am trying to find out a way to take advantage of 2004 Priority date I have (assuming Eb3 I-140 is approved).
Could you please help out, if you have any ideas!!
girlfriend Dairy Regions Map
immi2006
07-02 08:55 AM
If you know sources from well known place pls quote.
No need to create rumor and panic. Sorry - no offence intended.
We are all stressed out as it is.. let us wait for official note on this.
I heard USCIS already retrogressed and rejecting Jul filer? is it true. need urgent help :mad: :mad:
No need to create rumor and panic. Sorry - no offence intended.
We are all stressed out as it is.. let us wait for official note on this.
I heard USCIS already retrogressed and rejecting Jul filer? is it true. need urgent help :mad: :mad:
hairstyles Dahlonega Gold Museum
FredG
April 7th, 2004, 06:33 PM
Looks like a tough little guy to capture. The way things are lined up, I think you could successfully clone out the branches in front of him. I'd leave the others. Any more sharpening would over-sharpen thetail. Although you could copy the layer, apply more sharpening to the layer, then mask out everything except the parts of the head you'd like to change.
Fred
Fred
kedoubt
05-17 10:41 AM
Hi,
I will be done with my second master's this July 29. I have two months grace period to leave the country as I already used my OPT after my first master's. I have a job offer and they are willing to do my H1B which starts from October 2011. But my two months grace period will end this september 29. If my H1B is filed in September under Premium processing, will I be in status or out of status for those two days. Did any one face similar problem before. If so, can you please give me the solution?
Thanks,
KEDoubt
I will be done with my second master's this July 29. I have two months grace period to leave the country as I already used my OPT after my first master's. I have a job offer and they are willing to do my H1B which starts from October 2011. But my two months grace period will end this september 29. If my H1B is filed in September under Premium processing, will I be in status or out of status for those two days. Did any one face similar problem before. If so, can you please give me the solution?
Thanks,
KEDoubt
nousername
11-12 01:50 PM
Sanju, I hope you were right but they are talking about immigrants in totality (legal and illegal) . Unfortunately with the bad economy and job market this fire might be heading our way i.e. legal EB guys. (I hope I'm wrong)
fueling the fire, but they better make sure the fire drivesoff the right monsters , the illegals.
fueling the fire, but they better make sure the fire drivesoff the right monsters , the illegals.
No comments:
Post a Comment