Jaime
09-12 01:55 PM
Who do you know?
wallpaper really good with red hair!
bkshres
10-07 01:00 PM
Recently I joined new company using AC21. When I joined this new company, my new company told me that they will not handle any immigration matter but will provide with necessary documents if needed. So, I asked my previous attorney to continue my case and he prepared letter for AC21 and sent to USCIS. Now, after couple of weeks, now the lawyer from my new company sent me G-28 form to fill, which is technically to switch the attorney and telling me that this new attorney will be sending AC21 documents again. But my new company is not doing G-28 for my wife. So, now I am in delemma whether to file G-28 and switch the attoney and send AC21 documents again.
Is it advisable to stay with old attorney as he had all the original documents and whatever being sent to USCIS OR switch to new attorney appointed by new company. This new attorney also saying that most of the time G-28 form will never make to USCIS I485 case and will get lost in mailroom. In that case all the correspondence will still goto old attorney. So, I wasn't sure what is safest and best way to handle this.
From my prospective, I should be good since my old attorney already sent AC21 documents to USCIS including my apointment letter from new employer with copies of all necessary document. so, Do I need to switch attorney at this stage of Green card (I485). What could be the possible queries in future regarding AC21. My old company is very reputed and they will not revoke my I-140. Similarly my new company is also very reputed. Both are in similar business and my job is similar and both are fortune 100 companies.
My case is EB3 ROW with priority date of March 2006. Now I am working on EAD.
Thanks in advance.
BK
Is it advisable to stay with old attorney as he had all the original documents and whatever being sent to USCIS OR switch to new attorney appointed by new company. This new attorney also saying that most of the time G-28 form will never make to USCIS I485 case and will get lost in mailroom. In that case all the correspondence will still goto old attorney. So, I wasn't sure what is safest and best way to handle this.
From my prospective, I should be good since my old attorney already sent AC21 documents to USCIS including my apointment letter from new employer with copies of all necessary document. so, Do I need to switch attorney at this stage of Green card (I485). What could be the possible queries in future regarding AC21. My old company is very reputed and they will not revoke my I-140. Similarly my new company is also very reputed. Both are in similar business and my job is similar and both are fortune 100 companies.
My case is EB3 ROW with priority date of March 2006. Now I am working on EAD.
Thanks in advance.
BK
srikondoji
06-27 01:19 PM
Can i file for I-485 while my H1-B extension petition is pending?
Should i premium process my H1-B petition before i can be ready to file my I-485 in july?
Thanks
sri
Should i premium process my H1-B petition before i can be ready to file my I-485 in july?
Thanks
sri
2011 red hair full fringe.
grinch
05-19 05:45 PM
Thats the best style on these forums
more...
sukhyani
06-23 01:04 PM
IF dates stay current THEN
I-485 processing is FIFO based on receipt date of I-485
ELSE
I-485 processing is FIFO based on PD
END IF
:)
Man you need to go help USCIS write a good program that helps them become efficient. I am still struggling with the idea that they lose thousands of Visa numbers every year just because of their inefficiency.
I-485 processing is FIFO based on receipt date of I-485
ELSE
I-485 processing is FIFO based on PD
END IF
:)
Man you need to go help USCIS write a good program that helps them become efficient. I am still struggling with the idea that they lose thousands of Visa numbers every year just because of their inefficiency.
mrana
01-14 12:29 AM
Mcom+MBA+Mphil +NET + 5 yrs exp as lecturer in Delhi.
more...
freddyCR
January 31st, 2005, 02:43 PM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/cafetos1Medium.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/2005_0129LA-Paz0010Medium.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/cafetos2Medium.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/coffeeBW3Medium.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/2005_0129LA-Paz0010Medium.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/cafetos2Medium.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/coffeeBW3Medium.jpg
2010 rihanna long red hair fringe.
iheartindia79
10-23 02:15 PM
I got LUD on AP (I-131).. What does it means? Is there any problem or RFE..
I saw a LUD on AP too. But, I have no idea what does it mean.
Anyone who could share?
I saw a LUD on AP too. But, I have no idea what does it mean.
Anyone who could share?
more...
24fps
02-26 10:06 PM
Revert back to my previous post, don't know why you're double posting a thread.
hair rihanna long red hair fringe.
eb3India
06-22 10:35 AM
Congradulations again to all those IV memeber who are getting Green card approvals and goodluck to all those members who are able to file their I485 and get EAD, just to be out of H1B /H4 clutches and one more step closer to green card
As current drastic visa movment proved the fact that for IV members main issue is not current law but itz implimentation. a change in law will certainly help, but thatz not our big problem
I would like to discuss your IV future agend with current situation, Please post your opinion how you think IV should procede based on current situations.
I belive IV should now concentrate more on making sure current law is implimented in a more effeciant way, make sure USCIS does not waste any visa numbers, we need to push for speeding citizenship processes and makeup for loss time during retrogression
IV should stop chasing CIR which has nothing for us and itz very controversial
IV is for legals and we should concentrate only on whatz good for us
I really appreciate core members opinion
by the way I got my approval for my I485
As current drastic visa movment proved the fact that for IV members main issue is not current law but itz implimentation. a change in law will certainly help, but thatz not our big problem
I would like to discuss your IV future agend with current situation, Please post your opinion how you think IV should procede based on current situations.
I belive IV should now concentrate more on making sure current law is implimented in a more effeciant way, make sure USCIS does not waste any visa numbers, we need to push for speeding citizenship processes and makeup for loss time during retrogression
IV should stop chasing CIR which has nothing for us and itz very controversial
IV is for legals and we should concentrate only on whatz good for us
I really appreciate core members opinion
by the way I got my approval for my I485
more...
like_watching_paint_dry
06-03 09:10 PM
should I get a white cat or black cat
I want to avoid me being racist on cats.
No wait, it can be better..
My friend wants to buy a cat which one should he get black or white.
Get a zebra.
No wait. Tell your friend to get a Zebra.
I want to avoid me being racist on cats.
No wait, it can be better..
My friend wants to buy a cat which one should he get black or white.
Get a zebra.
No wait. Tell your friend to get a Zebra.
hot Long Curly Hair Cuts
tslee
04-22 12:14 PM
Dear all:
May I ask what I should do in the following situation?
I hold F1 visa and my new job starts on Sept 1. The int'l student office of my current university mistakenly set my OPT start date on May 6. My OPT has been approved and EAD card arrived.
That is, I will have 120-plus "unemployment" days accumulated by early August, which will then violate the "90-day unemployment rule" of OPT.
I am under tremendous pressure and really want to hear your opinions.
Many thanks in advance!
May I ask what I should do in the following situation?
I hold F1 visa and my new job starts on Sept 1. The int'l student office of my current university mistakenly set my OPT start date on May 6. My OPT has been approved and EAD card arrived.
That is, I will have 120-plus "unemployment" days accumulated by early August, which will then violate the "90-day unemployment rule" of OPT.
I am under tremendous pressure and really want to hear your opinions.
Many thanks in advance!
more...
house Short Straight with Red Bangs
h1techSlave
02-24 08:51 AM
E-verify is not to prevent H1 folks from working or investing. It is against illegals.
2 weeks ago i closed 30 year fixed ..I didnt face any issue ..Right now my mortgage held by Fannie. I got a good deal though i am on H1B!
2 weeks ago i closed 30 year fixed ..I didnt face any issue ..Right now my mortgage held by Fannie. I got a good deal though i am on H1B!
tattoo Rihanna Long Red Hair Fringe.
Blog Feeds
11-18 03:00 PM
Dallas-Fort Worth Immigration Lawyer Has Just Posted the Following:
On November 12, 2009, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) launched a 30 day pilot program to test the entry process for travelers under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) from Auckland, New Zealand to Los Angeles International Airport. The program automates the arrival/departure of travelers with an approved Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) for travelers on Air New Zealand Flight 6. Travelers on this flight will not need to fill out the paper I-94W.
The VWP allows nationals from VWP countries to fill out an ESTA application prior to traveling to the United States to determine the traveler’s eligibility and whether such travel poses a security risk. The ESTA application provides basic biographical, travel, and eligibility information and must be submitted online prior to traveling. There are currently 35 countries eligible to travel to the United States under the VWP. Travelers under this program may enter the U.S. for either business or tourism for up to 90 days without obtaining a visa.
To view the list of VWP countries please visit the CBP website at www.cbp.gov (http://www.cbp.gov).
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/temporary-visas/pilot-program-for-travelers-on-flight-6.php)
On November 12, 2009, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) launched a 30 day pilot program to test the entry process for travelers under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) from Auckland, New Zealand to Los Angeles International Airport. The program automates the arrival/departure of travelers with an approved Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) for travelers on Air New Zealand Flight 6. Travelers on this flight will not need to fill out the paper I-94W.
The VWP allows nationals from VWP countries to fill out an ESTA application prior to traveling to the United States to determine the traveler’s eligibility and whether such travel poses a security risk. The ESTA application provides basic biographical, travel, and eligibility information and must be submitted online prior to traveling. There are currently 35 countries eligible to travel to the United States under the VWP. Travelers under this program may enter the U.S. for either business or tourism for up to 90 days without obtaining a visa.
To view the list of VWP countries please visit the CBP website at www.cbp.gov (http://www.cbp.gov).
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/temporary-visas/pilot-program-for-travelers-on-flight-6.php)
more...
pictures Mid length red hair was curled
Queen Josephine
March 24th, 2007, 09:35 PM
Thanks guys. Nik, my boss took the decision out of my hands and had me order the 2 lense option. I'm hoping it's compact enough that I can hike with it. If so, he said he'd take my Canon Pro1 for the shop and I could have this. If I take it, then I'll look into your suggestion.
well queen my long lost thought you were gone forever to never come back friend.Thanks Mark....not gone, just slowing down a bit. Happens sometimes... but thank for the kind thoughts. I aprreciate it.
well queen my long lost thought you were gone forever to never come back friend.Thanks Mark....not gone, just slowing down a bit. Happens sometimes... but thank for the kind thoughts. I aprreciate it.